To read this content please select one of the options below:

Trade union merger strategies: good or bad?

John Gennard (Department of Human Resource Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK, and Editor, Employee Relations)

Employee Relations

ISSN: 0142-5455

Article publication date: 2 January 2009

2672

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this editorial is to review the significance of Roger Undy's book, Trade Union Merger Strategies: Purpose, Process and Performance, Oxford University Press, 2008.

Design/methodology/approach

The editorial outlines and evaluates the arguments put forward by Dr Undy to explain why trade union mergers take place. It also evaluates the book's analysis of the politics of trade union mergers.

Findings

As trade union membership has declined mergers have been prominent features in strategies of union revival. Yet, there is little empirical research into the effects of mergers on the unions actually merging or on their impact on the wider union movement. Dr Undy concludes that mergers do not provide a solution to the problem of falling membership and that transfers of engagements are often more successful than amalgamations.

Originality/value

The editorial offers insights into the process, performance and effects of trade union mergers.

Keywords

Citation

Gennard, J. (2009), "Trade union merger strategies: good or bad?", Employee Relations, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 116-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450910925274

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles