To read this content please select one of the options below:

Non‐parametric assessment of CEO compensation practices

James J. Cordeiro (Department of Business Administration and Economics, SUNY Brockport, Brockport, New York, USA)
Pracheta Mukherjee (Mukherjee Associates, Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania, USA)
D. Donald Kent (Department of Business Administration and Economics, SUNY Brockport, Brockport, New York, USA)

Management Research News

ISSN: 0140-9174

Article publication date: 1 May 2006

1632

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this research is to present an alternative to the vast majority of studies on chief executive officer (CEO) compensation practices in the USA which have relied on multiple regression analysis and its variants.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper points out the shortcomings of traditional parametric approaches (such as regression analysis) to the analysis of CEO compensation practices and suggest non‐parametric alternatives.

Findings

Using tests for concurrent validity, the paper demonstrates how non‐parametric assessment may be successfully applied to the analysis of CEO compensation practices.

Originality/value

Because of the novelty of this approach, the findings should be of value to those academics and practitioners interested in the evaluation of CEO compensation practices.

Keywords

Citation

Cordeiro, J.J., Mukherjee, P. and Donald Kent, D. (2006), "Non‐parametric assessment of CEO compensation practices", Management Research News, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170610674383

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles