To read this content please select one of the options below:

NZ IAS 32: An Evaluation of the Potential Impact on Financial Reporting by Issuers of Convertible Financial Instruments

Helen Bishop (Lecturer, School of Accountancy Massey University, Albany Campus, New Zealand)
Michael Bradbury (Professor of Accounting, School of Accountancy, Law and Finance, Unitec New Zealand)
Tony van Zijl (Professor of Accounting & Financial Management, School of Accounting & Commercial Law, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand)

Pacific Accounting Review

ISSN: 0114-0582

Article publication date: 1 July 2005

831

Abstract

We assess the impact of NZ IAS 32 on the financial reporting of convertible financial instruments by retrospective application of the standard to a sample of New Zealand companies over the period 1988 ‐ 2003. NZ IAS 32 has a broader definition of liabilities than does the corresponding current standard (FRS‐31) and it does not permit convertibles to be reported under headings that are intermediate to debt and equity. The results of the study indicate that in comparison with the reported financial position and performance, the reporting of convertibles in accordance with NZ IAS 32 would result in higher amounts for liabilities and higher interest. Thus, analysts using financial statement information to assess risk of financial distress will need to revise the critical values of commonly used measures of risk and performance when companies report under NZ IAS

Keywords

Citation

Bishop, H., Bradbury, M. and van Zijl, T. (2005), "NZ IAS 32: An Evaluation of the Potential Impact on Financial Reporting by Issuers of Convertible Financial Instruments", Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/01140580510818594

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles