To read this content please select one of the options below:

Money ethic endorsement, self‐reported income, and life satisfaction: University faculty in the US and Spain

Thomas Li‐Ping Tang (Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA)
Roberto Luna‐Arocas (Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA)
and
Harold D. Whiteside (Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA)

Personnel Review

ISSN: 0048-3486

Article publication date: 1 December 2003

1870

Abstract

This research examines the money ethic scale (budget, evil, equity, success, and motivator), self‐reported income, demographic variables, and life satisfaction among 207 professors in the USA and 102 professors in Spain. Results suggested that the female/male income ratio was 70.95 percent for American professors and 63.82 percent for Spanish professors. American faculty reported higher scores on factors budget, equity, and success, and lower scores on factor evil than their Spanish counterparts. Sex (male), factors budget, education, and work experience were predictors of American professors’ income, while work experience, sex (male), education, and factor motivator were predictors of Spanish professors’ income. For the American sample, marital status (married), factors budget, sex (male), a low level of education, and a low level of factor success were predictors of life satisfaction, whereas for the Spanish sample, marital status (married), young age, and factor budget were predictors of life satisfaction. Income was not related to life satisfaction in both samples.

Keywords

Citation

Li‐Ping Tang, T., Luna‐Arocas, R. and Whiteside, H.D. (2003), "Money ethic endorsement, self‐reported income, and life satisfaction: University faculty in the US and Spain", Personnel Review, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 756-773. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480310498701

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles