To read this content please select one of the options below:

Coping with multiple dimensions of work‐family conflict

Denise M. Rotondo (Perdue School of Business, Salisbury University, Salisbury, Maryland, USA)
Dawn S. Carlson (Hankamer School of Business, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA)
Joel F. Kincaid (Perdue School of Business, Salisbury University, Salisbury, Maryland, USA)

Personnel Review

ISSN: 0048-3486

Article publication date: 1 June 2003

7374

Abstract

One way to reduce work‐family conflict is for individuals to have the ability to effectively cope with the stressful demands. The relationships between four styles of work and family coping (direct action, help‐seeking, positive thinking, and avoidance/resignation) and levels of work‐family conflict are considered. Two different forms of work‐family conflict (time‐based and strain‐based) were examined as well as the effect of direction (work interfering with family, family interfering with work) to examine the efficacy of different coping styles. Help‐seeking and direct action coping used at home were associated with lower family interfering with work conflict levels. Avoidance/resignation coping was associated with higher conflict levels of all types. The results suggest individuals may have greater control and opportunity for positive change within the family domain compared with the work environment.

Keywords

Citation

Rotondo, D.M., Carlson, D.S. and Kincaid, J.F. (2003), "Coping with multiple dimensions of work‐family conflict", Personnel Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 275-296. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480310467606

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles