Partnerships for corporate social responsibility

Andre Nijhof (University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands)
Theo de Bruijn (University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands)
Hakan Honders (KPMG, Amstelveen, The Netherlands)

Management Decision

ISSN: 0025-1747

Publication date: 8 February 2008

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to conceptualise the extent to which partnerships with non‐governmental organisations (NGOs) are a necessity for successful efforts of businesses in the area of corporate social responsibility (CSR).

Design/methodology/approach

The main findings are based on an analysis of existing literature on NGO typologies and strategies for CSR and illustrated with examples from the Dutch National Research Program on CSR.

Findings

Based on three different strategies towards CSR, the suggestion is that NGOs tend to become involved in partnerships with companies that have an interest in postponing concrete results, while partnerships with companies that have the potential for the biggest contribution to the ambitions of NGOs have the highest risk of diminishing NGO‐legitimacy.

Research limitations/implications

This is a conceptual paper. Suggestions are given to test the hypotheses put forward as well as the actual results associated with each of the strategies towards corporate social responsibility.

Practical implications

Whatever strategy a company opts for, managers should be aware that every strategy has a reverse side. Being aware of the weak spots of one's own strategy is important to anticipate claims associated with one of the other strategies.

Originality/value

Theory in the field of CSR emphasises the necessity to involve NGOs in embedding social issues in the strategies and day‐to‐day operations of organisations. This paper proves that this emphasis is not always justified and presents arguments when certain forms of NGO involvement are required.

Keywords

Citation

Nijhof, A., de Bruijn, T. and Honders, H. (2008), "Partnerships for corporate social responsibility", Management Decision, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 152-167. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810846798

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.