Bibliometric and webometric methods for assessing research collaboration

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to describe the methods and findings of a pilot study which applied bibliometrics and webometrics to examine collaboration in Malaysian biotechnology.

Design/methodology/approach

The research applied bibliometric and webometric methods to publications and web sites affiliated with Malaysian institutions. The bibliometric analysis focused on biotechnology‐related journal articles indexed in Web of Knowledge. The webometric analysis examined the web sites of top biotechnology institutions generated in the bibliometric analysis. Collaboration behaviour was assessed in three ways: intra‐institutional versus inter‐institutional; national versus international collaboration; and by type of institution collaboration according to the triple helix model.

Findings

Findings of the pilot study, which applied bibliometric and webometric analyses to a limited sample, indicate that the methodologies will collect the desired data for a more extensive study.

Research limitations/implications

The quantitative research results describe the collaboration evident in publications and web sites, but not why it has happened in such a way.

Practical implications

The methodologies provide a framework for similar research exploring the impacts of collaboration in an e‐research environment. The methodology is innovative and practical in terms of the combined use of bibliometric and webometric analyses.

Originality/value

This is one of few studies that has examined collaboration using both bibliometric and webometric methods, and elements of the methodology appear to be unique to the study. The methodologies will contribute to an emerging body of literature that explores the nature of research productivity and research collaboration.

Citation

Shari, S., Haddow, G. and Genoni, P. (2012), "Bibliometric and webometric methods for assessing research collaboration", Library Review, Vol. 61 No. 8/9, pp. 592-607. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531211292097