To read this content please select one of the options below:

Obsolescence in subject description

Michael K. Buckland (School of Information, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA)

Journal of Documentation

ISSN: 0022-0418

Article publication date: 2 March 2012

7139

Abstract

Purpose

The paper aims to explain the character and causes of obsolescence in assigned subject descriptors.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper takes the form of a conceptual analysis with examples and reference to existing literature.

Findings

Subject description comes in two forms: assigning the name or code of a subject to a document and assigning a document to a named subject category. Each method associates a document with the name of a subject. This naming activity is the site of tensions between the procedural need of information systems for stable records and the inherent multiplicity and instability of linguistic expressions. As languages change, previously assigned subject descriptions become obsolescent. The issues, tensions, and compromises involved are introduced.

Originality/value

Drawing on the work of Robert Fairthorne and others, an explanation of the unavoidable obsolescence of assigned subject headings is presented. The discussion relates to libraries, but the same issues arise in any context in which subject description is expected to remain useful for an extended period of time.

Keywords

Citation

Buckland, M.K. (2012), "Obsolescence in subject description", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 68 No. 2, pp. 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411211209168

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles