TY - JOUR AB - Purpose– The article concerns information literacies in an environment characterised by the two partly competing and contradictory cultures of print and digital. The aim of the paper is to provide a better understanding of the ways in which students assess the credibility of sources they use in school, with a particular interest in how they treat participatory genres.Design/methodology/approach– An ethnographic study of a school class's project work was conducted through observations, interviews, and log books in blog form. The analysis was influenced by a socio‐cultural perspective.Findings– The study provides increased empirically based understanding of students' information literacy practices. Four non‐exclusive approaches to credibility stemming from control, balance, commitment, and multiplicity were identified.Originality/value– The study adds to the understanding of how credibility is assessed in school environments with a particular focus on how digital and participatory genres are treated. VL - 67 IS - 4 SN - 0022-0418 DO - 10.1108/00220411111145043 UR - https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111145043 AU - Francke Helena AU - Sundin Olof AU - Limberg Louise PY - 2011 Y1 - 2011/01/01 TI - Debating credibility: the shaping of information literacies in upper secondary school T2 - Journal of Documentation PB - Emerald Group Publishing Limited SP - 675 EP - 694 Y2 - 2024/04/23 ER -