TY  - JOUR
AB  - The formulation consisting of 50ppm ATMP and 300ppm MoO42‐ had only 32 per cent efficiency in inhibiting the corrosion of mild steel immersed in a neutral aqueous environment containing 60ppm C1‐, whereas the ATMP (50ppm) ‐ MoO42‐ (300ppm) ‐ Zn2+ (50ppm) system had 96 per cent inhibition efficiency. The lower inhibition efficiency in the former case was due to the dissolution of the protective film formed on the metal surface, and getting precipitated in the bulk of the solution; this system controlled the anodic reaction only. The latter system controlled both the anodic and cathodic reactions; the dissolution of the protective film formed on the metal surface was reduced to a greater extent.
VL  - 45
IS  - 2
SN  - 0003-5599
DO  - 10.1108/00035599810198750
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/00035599810198750
AU  - Rajendran Susai
AU  - Apparao B.V.
AU  - Periasamy V.
AU  - Karthikeyan G.
AU  - Palaniswamy N.
PY  - 1998
Y1  - 1998/01/01
TI  - Comparison of the corrosion inhibition efficiencies of the ATMP‐molybdate system and the ATMP‐molybdate‐Zn2+ system
T2  - Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials
PB  - MCB UP Ltd
SP  - 109
EP  - 112
Y2  - 2024/09/23
ER  -