Who Steers the Field of Consumer Protection and Environmental Regulations? An American–European Comparison

Abstract

This chapter examines whether the European Union or the United States set the parameters in the field of consumer protection and environmental regulations. The analysis points out that there is no straightforward answer because leadership rotates or fluctuates depending on the extent to which societies and decision makers feel strongly about a particular issue. Examples are tobacco control and regulations with regards to genetically modified crops and food. The US identified the risks related to the wide availability of cigarettes before the EU, while the EU highlighted the risks related to the introduction of GM crops/products in the absence of similar American concerns. Both cultural and institutional developments account for this divergence. A unique combination of factors heightened the salience of anti-smoking measures in the US, while an equally distinctive matrix of developments highlighted the social, economic, health, and safety challenges of genetically modified organism (GMO). However, in spite of different constellations of institutional and cultural factors, the EU has embraced tobacco control and the American private sector is slightly more cautious about pushing GM crops onto the market.

Citation

Kurzer, P. (2006), "Who Steers the Field of Consumer Protection and Environmental Regulations? An American–European Comparison", Laible, J. and Barkey, H.J. (Ed.) European Responses to Globalization (Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, Vol. 88), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-3759(06)88003-4