To read this content please select one of the options below:

Chapter 3: The 2003 SARS Outbreak in Canada: Legal and Ethical Lessons About the Use of Quarantine

Ethics and Epidemics

ISBN: 978-0-76231-311-2, eISBN: 978-1-84950-412-6

Publication date: 9 November 2006

Abstract

The 2003 global outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) was an abrupt reminder that infectious diseases pose a continuing threat to human health. In 1967, U.S. Surgeon General William H. Stewart declared “it was time to close the book on infectious diseases” (Garrett, 1994, citing W.H. Stewart, “A Mandate for State Action,” presented at the Association of State and Territorial Health Officers, Washington, DC, December 4, 1967). In the latter half of the twentieth century, many shared this bold view that medical science had vanquished infectious disease. As a result, public health struggled to remain relevant in the face of advances in pharmaceuticals, surgery, genetics and other areas that were becoming increasingly dominant in the quest to extend and enhance human life. SARS forced many to rethink the significance of public health and the crisis, though relatively short-lived, (for commentary on the disparities between the responses to HIV and SARS, see e.g. Altman (2003)) underscored the need to rebuild public health capacity that had been allowed to slip down the health system priority list.

Citation

Ries, N.M. (2006), "Chapter 3: The 2003 SARS Outbreak in Canada: Legal and Ethical Lessons About the Use of Quarantine", Balint, J., Philpott, S., Baker, R. and Strosberg, M. (Ed.) Ethics and Epidemics (Advances in Bioethics, Vol. 9), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 43-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(06)09003-0

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited