TY  - CHAP
AB  - Despite the recent slow down in overall activity, acquisitions continue to be a popular growth strategy used by firms competing in a globally competitive marketplace (Duck, Sirower & Dumas, 2002). At the same time, acquisitions are more of a complex phenomenon than ever in that the conditions under which they enhance or destroy firm value still remain unclear despite the wealth of acquisition studies in finance and management. In fact, recent studies by several major consulting and advisory services firms provide evidence that at a minimum one-third to one-half of these deals fail to achieve anticipated benefits, cost savings and other outcomes (KPMG, 1999; Mergerstat, 2000; PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2000). Even more alarming, the latest reports released by Booz Allen and Hamilton (2001) and BusinessWeek (Henry, 2002) indicate that this “failure” to deliver announced benefits and improvements in shareholder wealth increases to over 60% when examining large M&As which typically bring together two firms that not only compete in similar product or market domains but also have comparable size positions. Thus, the question lingers…What distinguishes those acquisitions that are successful in meeting intended goals and performance improvements from those that are not successful?
VL  - 3
SN  - 978-1-84950-264-1, 978-0-76231-101-9/1479-361X
DO  - 10.1016/S1479-361X(04)03004-2
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-361X(04)03004-2
AU  - Ellis Kimberly M
AU  - Lamont Bruce T
PY  - 2004
Y1  - 2004/01/01
TI  - “IDEAL” ACQUISITION INTEGRATION APPROACHES IN RELATED ACQUISITIONS OF EQUALS: A TEST OF LONG-HELD BELIEFS
T2  - Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions
T3  - Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 81
EP  - 102
Y2  - 2024/09/23
ER  -