The influence of outcome knowledge on judges and jurors’ evaluations of auditor decisions: A review and synthesis of prior research

Abstract

During the last several years, a stream of research has evolved that investigates the influence of outcome information on evaluation judgments in an auditor legal liability context. These studies have included judges and jurors and have utilized different cases and scenarios. Our objective in this paper is to review and discuss insights from this stream of research. This research consists of three phases. Phase 1 focuses on the robust manifestation of outcome effects in an audit legal liability context, Phase 2 examines the effectiveness of selected mitigation strategies in moderating outcome effects, and Phase 3 begins the process of developing a preliminary theoretical framework. We also discuss future research that could be done to better understand outcome effects and to test operational responses and proposed remedies.

Citation

Jordan Lowe, D. and Reckers, P.M.J. (2006), "The influence of outcome knowledge on judges and jurors’ evaluations of auditor decisions: A review and synthesis of prior research", Arnold, V., Clinton, B.D., Luckett, P., Roberts, R., Wolfe, C. and Wright, S. (Ed.) Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research (Advances in Accounting Behavioural Research, Vol. 9), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 157-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1488(06)09006-5