7)
Editorial Board
Vision of Quality: How Evaluators Define, Understand and Represent Program Quality
ISBN: 978-0-76230-771-5, eISBN: 978-1-84950-101-9
ISSN: 1474-7863
Publication date: 15 June 2001
Citation
(2001), "Editorial Board", Benson, A.P., Michelle Hinn, D. and Lloyd, C. (Ed.) Vision of Quality: How Evaluators Define, Understand and Represent Program Quality (Advances in Program Evaluation, Vol. 7), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, p. ii. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-7863(01)80058-2
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2001, Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Editorial Board
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Representing quality in evaluation
- Why finding new forms for representing quality matters
- Representing the truth about program quality or the truth about representing program quality
- Communicating quality
- Understanding program quality: A dialectic process
- The relational and dialogic dimensions of program quality
- Empowerment evaluation: The pursuit of quality
- Communicating quality and qualities: The role of the evaluator as critical friend
- Culture, standards, and program qualities
- Determining program quality of a social service collaborative using case study methods and moving toward participatory evaluation
- Use as a criterion of quality in evaluation
- Descriptive values and social justice
- Defining, improving, and communicating program quality
- Evaluating the aesthetic face of leadership
- The metaphor of the portfolio in evaluating teacher education programs
- Performance-based assessment: A quality improvement strategy