To read this content please select one of the options below:

The Injustice of Intersex: Feminist Science Studies and the Writing of a Wrong

Toward a Critique of Guilt: Perspectives from Law and the Humanities

ISBN: 978-0-76231-189-7, eISBN: 978-1-84950-334-1

Publication date: 6 July 2005

Abstract

My discussion of intersexuality's changing exemplificatory position within feminist studies of science explains how its medical management has emerged as an exemplary injustice of recognition. Specifically, the surgical protocol that aims to make unusual genitalia invisible, and the medical obfuscation of intersexuality's ramifications for the cultural construction of gender, have been written as a wrong by Anne Fausto-Sterling and Suzanne Kessler. By mapping intersex treatment as a discursively produced injustice, I argue that it is accordingly within discourse that the wrongs of intersex treatment may be redressed – not by undoing past surgeries, or by punishing clinicians as personally “guilty.”

Citation

Morland, I. (2005), "The Injustice of Intersex: Feminist Science Studies and the Writing of a Wrong", Anderson, M. (Ed.) Toward a Critique of Guilt: Perspectives from Law and the Humanities (Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 36), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 53-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-4337(05)36004-2

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited