TY  - CHAP
AB  - This article focuses on one court case concerning the regulation of Anti-Abortion protesting and asks: (1) Do the various actors involved in this case recognize a tension between their actions and their broader beliefs concerning the regulation of political protests? (2) If this tension is recognized, how do the actors resolve it, and if it is not recognized, why is it not? While concerned with legal consciousness and cognitive dissonance, the article is framed by broader questions concerning tolerance and the interaction of law and political passions.
VL  - 35
SN  - 978-1-84950-327-3, 978-0-76231-179-8/1059-4337
DO  - 10.1016/S1059-4337(04)35005-2
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-4337(04)35005-2
AU  - Wilson Joshua C.
PY  - 2005
Y1  - 2005/01/01
TI  - WHEN RIGHTS COLLIDE: ANTI-ABORTION PROTESTS AND THE IDEOLOGICAL DILEMMA IN PLANNED PARENTHOOD SHASTA-DIABLO, INC. V. WILLIAMS
T2  - Studies in Law, Politics and Society
T3  - Studies in Law, Politics, and Society
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 145
EP  - 190
Y2  - 2024/09/23
ER  -