TY - CHAP AB - Risk preference theory posits that females are more religious than males because they are more risk averse and are thus more motivated by the threat of afterlife punishment. We evaluate the theory formally and empirically. Formally, we show that the rational choice reasoning implied by the theory leads to unexpected conclusions if one considers belief in eternal rewards as well as eternal punishment. Empirically, we examine cross-cultural data and find that, across many populations, sex differences in religiosity are no smaller among those who do not believe in hell. We conclude by arguing that psychological characteristics are almost certainly crucial to understanding the difference, just not risk preference. VL - 24 SN - 978-0-7623-1430-0, 978-1-84950-496-6/0882-6145 DO - 10.1016/S0882-6145(07)24008-1 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(07)24008-1 AU - Freese Jeremy AU - Montgomery James D. ED - Shelley J. Correll PY - 2007 Y1 - 2007/01/01 TI - The Devil made her do it? Evaluating Risk Preference as an Explanation of Sex Differences in Religiousness T2 - Social Psychology of Gender T3 - Advances in Group Processes PB - Emerald Group Publishing Limited SP - 187 EP - 229 Y2 - 2024/03/28 ER -