TY  - CHAP
AB  - Enduring scholarly interest in the process of strategy-making stems from an abiding assumption that some ways of strategizing are more efficacious than others, and thus lead to higher firm performance in the long run; higher than luck alone would bring. Expressions of interest in and endorsements of the strategy process are abundant in the academic literature. As Pettigrew (1992) points out, Hofer and Schendel's pioneering definition of strategic management is processual in character emphasizing the development and utilization of strategy. Rumelt, Schendel, and Teece (1994) list the policy process question – how does policy process matter? – as a fundamental question of the strategic management field. Porter (1996) expresses preoccupation with the leadership and organizational challenges of managing the process. And, Hamel (1988) exhorts the field to devote as much attention to the conduct of strategy, i.e., the task of strategy making, as they have to its content. For senior managers and leaders, the question of how to make effective strategies stands usually at the top of their agenda. Not surprisingly then, the quest to uncover stable principles of good strategy making has attracted much support and interest over the years.
VL  - 22
SN  - 978-1-84950-340-2, 978-0-76231-200-9/0742-3322
DO  - 10.1016/S0742-3322(05)22019-3
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(05)22019-3
AU  - Szulanski Gabriel
AU  - Porac Joseph
AU  - Doz Yves
ED  - Gabriel Szulanski
ED  - Joe Porac
ED  - Yves Doz
PY  - 2005
Y1  - 2005/01/01
TI  - Strategy Process: Introduction to the Volume
T2  - Strategy Process
T3  - Advances in Strategic Management
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - xiii
EP  - xxxv
Y2  - 2024/04/25
ER  -