The contingent rationality of housing preferences: Homeless mentally ill persons' housing choices before and after housing experience

Abstract

Prior research indicates that homeless consumers of mental health services have a marked preference for independent living, while clinicians tend to recommend staffed, group housing. In order to understand this divergence and identify its consequences for mental health policy, we test influences on housing preferences suggested by rational choice and social structural perspectives. We use a randomized field trial of independent and group housing to identify the consequences for subsequent housing loss and consumer functioning of consumer- and clinician-determined housing placements. We find that consumer preference at baseline for independent living indicates greater vulnerability to housing loss, but the bases of preferences change after consumers gained experience with stable housing. We interpret the results as indicating the contingent rationality of preferences and the susceptibility of preferences to change with experience.

Citation

Schutt, R.K. and Goldfinger, S.M. (2000), "The contingent rationality of housing preferences: Homeless mentally ill persons' housing choices before and after housing experience", Morrissey, J.P. (Ed.) Research in Community and Mental Health (Research in Community and Mental Health, Vol. 11), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 131-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0192-0812(00)80007-0