TY  - CHAP
AB  - This chapter argues against the recent crystallization of “contentions politics” as the anchoring concept for the study of collective action on the grounds that it is overly restrictive, foreclosing consideration and analysis of much social movement activity not tied directly to government or the state and which thus falls beyond the bailiwick of the political arena. The problematic character of the contentious politics frame is discussed and illustrated both empirically and conceptually, and a more inclusive and elastic conceptualization is proposed and elaborated, one that conceives of movements broadly as collective challenges to systems of authority. This alternative conceptualization includes collective challenges within and to institutional, organizational, and cultural domains other than just the state or the polity. Not only are direct challenges to authorities included, but also movements that challenge authorities indirectly either through covert means, as in the case of terrorist movements, or by exiting the system, as in the case of separatist and communal movements and other-worldly religious “cults.”
VL  - 25
SN  - 978-0-76231-037-1, 978-1-84950-223-8/0163-786X
DO  - 10.1016/S0163-786X(04)25001-7
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-786X(04)25001-7
AU  - Snow David A.
ED  - Daniel J. Myers
ED  - Daniel M. Cress
PY  - 2004
Y1  - 2004/01/01
TI  - SOCIAL MOVEMENTS AS CHALLENGES TO AUTHORITY: RESISTANCE TO AN EMERGING CONCEPTUAL HEGEMONY
T2  - Authority in Contention
T3  - Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 3
EP  - 25
Y2  - 2024/04/24
ER  -