TY  - CHAP
AB  - The theory of the monetary circuit, as developed in its most powerful form by Graziani (1989), has made a significant contribution to the analysis of credit money in Marxian economics. A key issue is the extent to which circuit theory fails to take into account the relationship between sectors producing capital and consumption goods. In Marx’s reproduction schema, how much money do capitalists need to advance in order for exchange between sectors to balance, and for the circuit to be closed? The purpose of this paper is to address this issue by examining different models of the monetary circuit, each of which has a textual grounding in Marx’s often contradictory musings in Capital, Volume 2.Alongside alternative conceptions of the circuit of money, different interpretations exist about the role of the multiplier, which can be nested in Marx’s reproduction schema. The problem, from a Marxian point of view, is that in the existing literature investment is usually confined to the capital goods sector. It can be argued that Marx, for the most part, viewed investment as involving accumulation in both departments of production. Using a multiplier framework, derived from input-output technology, this wider treatment of investment is considered as an alternative way of modelling the circulation of money. In addition to contributing to Marxian analysis of the money circuit, this approach could also be more accessible to a wider Post Keynesian audience, since a scalar Keynesian multiplier is employed.
VL  - 21
SN  - 978-0-76231-098-2, 978-1-84950-263-4/0161-7230
DO  - 10.1016/S0161-7230(04)21006-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-7230(04)21006-9
AU  - Trigg Andrew B.
ED  - Paul Zarembka
PY  - 2004
Y1  - 2004/01/01
TI  - MARX AND THE THEORY OF THE MONETARY CIRCUIT
T2  - Neoliberalism in Crisis, Accumulation, and Rosa Luxemburg's Legacy
T3  - Research in Political Economy
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 143
EP  - 160
Y2  - 2024/04/25
ER  -