To read this content please select one of the options below:

Blinded by the light? Analyzing sustainability authenticity, customer service perceptions, and halo effects

Clinton Amos (Department of Business Administration and Marketing, Goddard School of Business and Economics, Weber State University, Ogden, Utah, USA)
Sebastian Brockhaus (Department of Management, Marketing, and Supply Chain, Boler College of Business, John Carroll University, University Heights, Ohio, USA)
Amydee M. Fawcett (Department of Management and Marketing, Goddard School of Business and Economics, Weber State University, Ogden, Utah, USA)
Stanley E. Fawcett (Department of Management and Marketing, Goddard School of Business and Economics, Weber State University, Ogden, Utah, USA)
A. Michael Knemeyer (Department of Marketing and Logistics, Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA)

The International Journal of Logistics Management

ISSN: 0957-4093

Article publication date: 7 September 2018

Issue publication date: 12 February 2019

1594

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate how service perceptions influence customer views of the authenticity of corporate sustainability claims. The goal of this paper is to help supply chain decision-makers better understand boundary conditions in order to design more enduring and impactful sustainability programs.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors employ behavioral experiments, subjecting two theoretically derived hypotheses to verification across five diverse industries and two distinct sustainability vignettes.

Findings

Customer service perceptions emerge as a significant boundary condition to the perceived authenticity of sustainability efforts. Subjects attributed significantly higher authenticity toward sustainability efforts in above average vs below average service quality contexts. Further, respondents attributed deceptive motivations to sustainability efforts at companies with below average service.

Research limitations/implications

The authors confirm the underlying tenet of social judgment theory, which suggests that a priori perceptions create a zone of acceptability or rejection. Ultimately, investing in sustainability can lead to counterproductive cynicism.

Practical implications

The authors infer that customers’ willingness to give companies credit for sustainability initiatives extends beyond service issues to any practice that influences a priori perceptions. Supply chain managers must rethink their role in designing both customer service and sustainability systems to achieve positive returns from sustainability investments.

Originality/value

The authors challenge the assumption that customers universally positively view sustainability efforts. If customers hold a priori negative service perceptions, otherwise well-designed sustainability programs may invoke cynical reactions. Thus, sustainability programs may not inoculate firm reputations from adverse incidents. Given they touch both service and sustainability systems, supply chain managers are positioned to holistically influence their design for competitive advantage.

Keywords

Citation

Amos, C., Brockhaus, S., Fawcett, A.M., Fawcett, S.E. and Knemeyer, A.M. (2019), "Blinded by the light? Analyzing sustainability authenticity, customer service perceptions, and halo effects", The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 117-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-12-2017-0344

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles